Lawsuit
Tells How PBS Bought into Right-wing Series
Originally
published in Current, August 5, 2002
By Karen Everhart
A
civil lawsuit filed against a right-leaning producer in Los Angeles
County July 19 offers an intriguing account of how public broadcasting
leaders negotiated to bring conservative programs to public TV after
members of Congress attacked PBS for liberal bias in 1992.
Writer
and commentator David Horowitz, who led the right's attack on pubcasting
during the CPB reauthorization process in the early '90s, tells
in his lawsuit how he used his political leverage to gain CPB and
PBS support for a conservative public affairs series that he proposed
to counterbalance Frontline.
Horowitz
is suing former partner Lionel Chetwynd, whom he blames for ending
the conservative documentary series National Desk (originally
Reverse Angle) in 2000. The two had been leaders of the Wednesday
Morning Club, a prominent right-wing Hollywood group that hosted
luncheons with speakers.
In
the suit, Horowitz claims a major role in launching the series.
He says he recruited Chetwynd, co-founded the nonprofit production
company Whidbey Island Films and raised a portion of the series
budget from conservative foundations.
At
the same time, Horowitz was maintaining pressure on PBS by publishing
the newsletter Comint, which battered pubcasters with negative articles
by Laurence Jarvik.
A
central figure in the complaint is former PBS President Ervin Duggan,
who negotiated directly with Horowitz to launch a four-part series,
according to the complaint, but later reacted angrily when Horowitz
lobbied Congress to push for its expansion into an ongoing series
on par with Frontline. Duggan did not respond to a request for an
interview.
In
his complaint seeking damages from Chetwynd, Horowitz alleges that
his former collaborator conspired to force him out of Whidbey Island.
Alleging that Chetwynd profited substantially from his relationship
with PBS, Horowitz demands a share of the profits plus other monetary
damages. Norman Powell, an executive producer with Whidbey Island,
also is named in the suit.
National
Desk went off the air in 2000 after PBS negotiated a new deal
with Chetwynd to produce higher-profile documentaries, the first
of which, "Darkness at High Noon," debuts next month (earlier
article). Horowitz tried to keep National Desk going by informing
influential House Republicans, and says the cancellation partially
motivated the lawsuit.
Chetwynd
"destroyed my project" and "enriched himself at my
expense," Horowitz told Current. "I need some justice,
and that's what this suit is about." Horowitz "seriously
misperceives the nature of the business and his lack of a role in
it," replied Mark Brifman, Chetwynd's attorney. "There's
no fraud and conspiracy, and there's no money."
The
complaint describes how Horowitz's campaign against liberal bias
on public broadcasting in the early 1990s opened the door to talks
with CPB and PBS leaders about corrective right-leaning programs.
CPB President Richard Carlson gave $250,000 for a treatment for
Horowitz's proposed six-part attack on 1960s leftism based on Destructive
Generation, a book co-written by Horowitz and Peter Collier. The
treatment was completed but never funded for production, Horowitz
said. CPB also backed two installments of Reverse Angle, which was
re-configured as the limited series National Desk after a meeting
between Carlson, Duggan and Horowitz in spring 1994.
At
this meeting, Horowitz proposed "a 22-segment PBS current affairs
series, as a parallel to Frontline," according to the complaint.
"Duggan countered by asking whether four parts would be satisfactory
to begin." CPB and PBS committed $1.3 million to the project.
Horowitz
approached funders of his own organization, the Center for the Study
of Popular Culture, to raise the $300,000 that completed National
Desk's first-season budget, according to the complaint. Whidbey
paid a 20 percent commission to the Center for Horowitz's fundraising
activities. To skirt a foundation's prohibition on fundraising commissions,
Whidbey booked the expense as a purchase of rights to Destructive
Generation, the complaint alleges.
Horowitz
continued to lobby Congress for more conservative programs, according
to the complaint, and he did this with Chetwynd's "full knowledge
and support." By June 1995, an irate Duggan confronted Horowitz
at an event in Nashville.
"He
really unloaded on me," Horowitz recalled. "I was quite
taken aback and didn't defend myself."
Two
months after the blow-up, Horowitz resigned from Whidbey after Chetwynd
told him that Duggan delivered an ultimatum that his continued involvement
with the company jeopardized the series' future. Horowitz said he
understood that he could return after the situation cooled off.
The
complaint alleges that Chetwynd lied about Duggan's threat. Horowitz
said he regards the former PBS prez as "fair-minded" and
is grateful that he "brought us into the system."
Duggan
did not lean on Whidbey to force Horowitz's resignation, nor did
Chetwynd tell Horowitz that Duggan was behind the ouster, said Brifman,
Chetwynd's attorney.
The
defendants have until late August to respond.
See
Comment by CIPB Executive Director Jerold Starr